Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. 2. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. my pleasure and gladly happen :) always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Openbsd is based. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Sign in Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. So I apologise for that. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Thnx again. eficompress infile outfile. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". I downloaded filename Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. @pbatard Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Any kind of solution? An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? privacy statement. Ventoy virtualizes the ISO as a cdrom device and boot it. 2. . You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. I am just resuming my work on it. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. can u test ? I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. privacy statement. Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Already have an account? As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. @ventoy ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. 3. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Besides, I'm considering that: If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. All other distros can not be booted. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. privacy statement. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. 5. extservice Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. Must hardreset the System. Option 2: bypass secure boot they reviewed all the source code). Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. DokanMounter Yes, I already understood my mistake. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Customizing installed software before installing LM. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. For these who select to bypass secure boot. There are many kinds of WinPE. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi Please test and tell your opinion. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. I'm not talking about CSM. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. My guess is it does not. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Thank you both for your replies. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. They can choose to run a signed Ubuntu EFI file and Ventoy can change it's default function using scripts and file injection. Its ok. Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Nierewa Junior Member. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. What exactly is the problem? Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . *lil' bow* In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. I've already disabled secure boot. . Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Error message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Sign in ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. 1. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS.
San Mateo County Coroner Death Notices, Articles V